Naive Gazeta

Tuesday, 7 July 2026 · 9 articles

China missile test: what do we know and why are countries in the region concerned?

The Guardian · 7 Jul, 05:59

China conducted a missile test in the Pacific on Monday, prompting condemnation from leaders including the US, Australia, and New Zealand, who accuse Beijing of destabilizing the region. The test involved a nuclear submarine launching a strategic missile carrying a training simulation warhead.

China carried out a missile test in the Pacific on Monday, with the missile reportedly flying thousands of kilometers across the Pacific. China described the test as a 'routine' military exercise. The test was likely designed to demonstrate China's military capabilities and compel the US to treat China as a more equal partner. The missile test marked Beijing's second publicly acknowledged long-range missile launch into the Pacific in less than two years.

Why it matters: The test has raised concerns among regional leaders and experts about China's military and nuclear buildup, as well as a lack of transparency over its intentions. Countries like the US and Australia have become increasingly concerned about China's push for influence in the Pacific and its desire to expand its military and nuclear capabilities. The test has also highlighted the need for China to be more transparent about its nuclear program and to engage in arms control agreements.

10,000 kilometers (reported range of the JL-3 submarine-launched ballistic missile), September 2024 (previous ICBM test), September 2025 (Beijing's military parade where the JL-3 was first formally unveiled), July 7 (start of Nato summit in Turkey)

China's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said: 'Relevant countries were notified in advance, and it complies with international law and practice. The launch activity was conducted safely, systematically, and professionally throughout.'

WiseTech shares rise after Richard White resigns as executive chair amid police investigation

The Guardian · 7 Jul, 05:23

Richard White has resigned as executive chair of WiseTech amid a police investigation into allegations he exploited a worker's financial and visa status for sex. White will remain as a board director and chief innovation officer, and Raelene Murphy will replace him as chair.

Richard White, co-founder of Australian tech company WiseTech, has resigned as executive chair amid a police investigation into allegations of exploiting a worker's financial and visa status for sex. White denied the allegations, stating he 'strenuously and unequivocally' denies them. He will remain as a board director and chief innovation officer. Raelene Murphy will replace him as chair, and the company announced that White's resignation aims to remove distractions from the company's business.

Why it matters: This is significant because WiseTech's market value has been under pressure due to the allegations against White and the company's struggles with AI competition. The changes in leadership may help restore investor confidence and allow the company to focus on its growth strategy. The company's share price rose 8.1% following the announcement, adding nearly $1bn to its market value.

8.1% (share price increase), $1bn (increase in market value), $40bn (WiseTech's market value in July 2025), $13bn (WiseTech's market value on Tuesday), 30% (workforce laid off in May), 2024 and 2025 (dates of significant events)

As I have stated previously, I strenuously and unequivocally deny the recent allegations in the media. Recent personal media attention is creating an unnecessary distraction from the strength of WiseTech’s business. - Richard White

June heatwave in UK led to ‘mass sleep deprivation’, poll suggests

The Guardian · 7 Jul, 05:00

A recent heatwave in the UK led to 'mass sleep deprivation', with two-thirds of people struggling to sleep, and almost half losing at least three hours of sleep per night. The heatwave is linked to global heating, which is expected to worsen in the future.

A YouGov poll conducted for Greenpeace found that the June heatwave in the UK caused significant disruptions to people's sleep, with 66% of respondents struggling to sleep and 47% losing at least three hours of sleep per night. The poll also found that 86% of people said their homes were too hot during the heatwave, and 25% said they or someone in their house had felt physically unwell as a result. The heatwave is consistent with scientific research showing that global heating is damaging sleep across the world.

Why it matters: The heatwave and its effects on sleep are significant because they highlight the already felt impacts of global heating on people's lives. The UK is expected to experience more heatwaves in the future, posing a threat to lives and livelihoods. The poll's findings emphasize the need for urgent action to address the climate crisis and protect people from its effects.

66% of people struggled to sleep during the heatwave, 47% lost at least three hours of sleep per night, 86% of homes were too hot, 25% of people or someone in their house felt physically unwell, 78% of people would struggle to afford retrofit upgrades to cope with future heatwaves, 10,000+ people died due to summer heatwaves between 2020 and 2024, 37.7C recorded at Lingwood, Norfolk during the heatwave, 23.5C and 23.2C record-breaking overnight minimums in Wales and England respectively.

The poll exposes the brutal reality of dragging our feet on climate action in the UK, such as mass sleep deprivation. Heatwaves are now a creeping health, housing and economic emergency that is costing families money they don’t have. And as these extremes become our new normal, the public wants the corporate polluters who made this mess to pay their fair share towards fixing it. - Mel Evans, head of climate at Greenpeace UK

Kremlin suspected of flying drones over Europe using Russian shadow fleet

Ars Technica · 6 Jul, 20:52

A recent assessment by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) suggests that mysterious drone flights over Europe, which disrupted major airports and flew over NATO military bases, may be part of a coordinated Kremlin campaign launched from Russian-linked commercial ships. The drone incidents, which occurred between August 2024 and February 2026, impacted a dozen NATO member countries and Ireland.

The IISS report identified 144 drone sightings over Europe between August 2024 and February 2026 that were unlikely to involve hobbyist recreational drones or drone activity related to the war in Ukraine. These sightings took place over various locations, including military bases (48%), critical infrastructure (26%), and civilian airports (18%). The drones were typically described as 'professional' or 'military-style' and often flew at night or early morning hours.

Why it matters: This is significant because the drone incidents revealed the vulnerability of European air defenses against surveillance and harassment incursions by low-cost drones. The suspected involvement of Russian-linked ships and 'shadow fleet' vessels suggests a coordinated Kremlin campaign, which raises concerns about the security of European airspace and the potential for future incidents.

144 (drone sightings), 48% (sightings over military bases), 26% (sightings over critical infrastructure), 18% (sightings over civilian airports), August 2024 - February 2026 (time period), 12 (NATO member countries impacted) + Ireland

China test-launches a ballistic missile in the South Pacific and raises regional concerns

NPR News · 7 Jul, 05:29

China test-launched a ballistic missile in the South Pacific, raising regional concerns, on the same day Australia and Fiji signed a mutual defense treaty to counter Chinese influence.

China conducted a test launch of a ballistic missile in the South Pacific, using a dummy warhead. The launch occurred on the same day that Australia and Fiji signed a mutual defense treaty aimed at countering Chinese influence in the region. The test has raised concerns among regional actors.

Why it matters: The missile test and the defense treaty are significant as they highlight the growing competition for influence in the Pacific region. China's military activities are being closely watched by its neighbors and other regional players, who are seeking to balance their relationships with China and other major powers.

NRC is (sort of) getting rid of "as low as reasonably achievable" standard

Ars Technica · 6 Jul, 17:48

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has proposed a new rule that updates its radiation exposure regulations, effectively retaining the current standards but with revised terminology. The changes are expected to save the industry $9.5 million annually.

The NRC has proposed a new rule that modifies its regulations on radiation exposure. The rule endorses the science behind current regulations but aims to clarify vague terminology. The changes are not a major overhaul, and the commission estimates they will result in cost savings of $9.5 million per year for the industry, including power, medical, and research applications. The new rule retains the principles of the 'linear non-threshold' (LNT) model and what is known as the 'as low as reasonably achievable' (ALARA) standard, but rephrases them to improve clarity.

Why it matters: This change is significant because it reflects a balance between ensuring safety and reducing regulatory burdens on the nuclear industry. The NRC's decision to retain the current scientific basis for its regulations while adjusting the language used may impact how nuclear power plants, medical facilities, and research institutions manage radiation exposure. The move is part of broader efforts to revitalize the US nuclear sector.

$9.5 million - the estimated annual cost savings for the industry from the proposed regulatory changes

FCC to end Biden-era rule that forces ISPs to list all their fees

Ars Technica · 6 Jul, 21:13

The FCC will vote to eliminate a rule requiring internet service providers (ISPs) to list all 'passthrough' fees on a broadband price label. This rule change may make it harder for consumers to find the labels.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is set to vote on ending a rule that mandates internet service providers (ISPs) to list all their 'passthrough' fees on an easily accessible broadband price label. ISPs often advertise lower prices than what consumers actually pay due to additional fees. These fees are claimed to offset charges imposed by local governments. The FCC has required ISPs to make specific price disclosures for over a decade.

Why it matters: This change is significant because it may impact transparency in broadband pricing. ISPs frequently advertise prices that are lower than the actual monthly bills consumers receive. By eliminating the rule, consumers might find it more challenging to understand the total cost of their internet services.

Tanker set ablaze after being struck by projectile in the Strait of Hormuz

NPR News · 7 Jul, 05:28

Summary not available.

What a divorce coach wishes couples knew before ending a marriage

NPR News · 7 Jul, 02:06

Summary not available.